In the News: Bob Reilly Explains His Stance Against Mixed Martial Arts



By budo-warrior ~ March 14th, 2009. Filed under: In the Media.

 

Cage Potato has a good interview with New York Assemblyman Bob Reilly on his stance on mixed martial arts.  Excerpts:

It’s not a stated goal, though.  Even though I grew up a boxing fan and consider myself one still, though I’m not an active fan now, I compare what we should be doing to the difference between amateur boxing and professional boxing.  You know how much safer amateur boxing is?  A blow in amateur boxing is scored for being a clean blow, not by the force behind it or the damage it causes.  

I once had a man come to me and say, ‘My nephew is a jiu-jitsu fighter who does MMA, and he has an advantage because of that.  What I’m really interested in is the skill of how he puts his jiu-jitsu skills against a boxer or whomever.’  I asked him, if that’s the case, why don’t people want to watch just jiu-jitsu?  Why isn’t that as popular?  In other words, I strongly believe, you take the violence out of this and it would lose its appeal.  Is it very popular with a certain segment of the population?  Certainly.  Is collegiate wrestling as popular?  No. 

read more

Jiu Jitsu Pro Gear

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • MySpace
  • del.icio.us
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google
  • Share/Save/Bookmark
Tags: , , , , ,

Reader's Comments

  1. Tim | March 15th, 2009 at 02:12

    I think the Congressman isn’t seeing the technical virtuosity at work in the ring setting.

    Also, I don’t understand how he says that boxing isn’t about hurting the other guy, when a KO is about putting it on someone. It’s not just boxing either– I know at least two if not more Olympic style TKD coaches who have told their fighters to “knock the guy out.”

  2. admin | April 11th, 2009 at 21:53

    I agree TIm!

Leave a Comment